Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 05 Jan 2020 19:05:52 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Lars Engels <lme@freebsd.org>, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Subject:   Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] BSD-Licensed Combinatorics library/utility
Message-ID:  <207F328C-0557-4BA5-9C1D-12BFB227F8D4@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <A263E747-779D-4CBE-B605-EFB1FA1F5BFF@freebsd.org>
References:  <51AD9B50-9488-45CE-878F-EE97F6914E49@freebsd.org> <201912121119.xBCBJ2Jo017249@fire.js.berklix.net> <20191212130825.GJ5400@e.0x20.net> <CANCZdfpmyk23w0RmYiVOHx3Qzga_H9G=uXypPgGkktwQqX_%2B%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <72753F50-8810-43C1-BDDD-E541278A146F@cschubert.com> <F436A4E2-5657-4B23-A574-2D66EA68A240@freebsd.org> <17EEA2EB-D963-449F-81FE-E18DD62B2BF6@bayofrum.net> <A263E747-779D-4CBE-B605-EFB1FA1F5BFF@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 5 January 2020 18:57:02 GMT, Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 5, 2020, at 09:26, Chris Rees <crees@bayofrum.net> wrote:
>>=20
>> Hi Devin,
>>=20
>> There are many examples where utilities have moved from ports to
>base- portsnap being one I can think of.
>>=20
>> I don't think that ports is really a dead zone for software- pkg
>install -y cmb takes around seven seconds, and I would struggle to
>imagine that anyone uses a system with no ports installed.
>>=20
>> The argument would obviously change if you wanted to use it in
>bsdinstall or similar- is that why you're frustrated here?
>>=20
>
>1. Build option survey for testing different combinations of options
>when building base
>2. Building ports built with different combinations of options when
>available
>
>Both of those situations may preclude having any packages installed.

We use devel/ccache with poudriere all the time- it's not really a big prob=
lem.

Having it in ports has the massive advantages that it becomes available for=
 all versions of FreeBSD, as well as having immediate bugfixes and the most=
 up to date version available at all times.

Granted, it does appear pretty mature... but given that no one needs to app=
rove a port being added (and there are many people who would gladly make on=
e), it would definitely be the best first step to get wider exposure more q=
uickly.

Even while the decisions on importing are ongoing, you could stick it in a =
port today.

"Ports are just as much a part of the OS as base".

Chris

--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?207F328C-0557-4BA5-9C1D-12BFB227F8D4>