Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:06:47 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 swtch.s src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c src/sys/sys systm.h Message-ID: <20040217170647.GA95247@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <7m3c99vp6i.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> References: <200401192127.i0JLRBL3041817@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040120175334.W3279@gamplex.bde.org> <20040213035557.M24031@gamplex.bde.org> <7mfzdexjzs.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20040215094444.F6303@gamplex.bde.org> <7m3c99vp6i.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:57:41PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > Sorry my stupid, but it seems everyone seems happy if traceback() > improvement happens. Is that really too hard to go forward? Alternatively, we could extend KASSERT to emit a file and line number like assert(3) and instead of panic(). Seems very logical to me. Just a thought. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040217170647.GA95247>