Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Feb 1999 17:05:42 +0100
From:      Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   some woes about rc.conf.site
Message-ID:  <19990207170542.A90515@titan.klemm.gtn.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi !

Sorry to say this, but after having to use rc.conf.site as it is now
I really kind of 'hate' it.

When we had one central rc.conf file it was fun to browse through
it and having all supported knobs visible at a glance.

No I have to use two vi sessions (or one ,more' and one ,vi' session)
in two different (!) windows (especially after a new installation,
when X isn't running anymore) and have to browse through both files,
to see what's missing in rc.site.conf.

Then rc.conf.site has a totally different sort order which is
not very helpful/comfortable, when comparing rc.conf and rc.conf.site.

Then rc.conf.site doesn't contain every knob which rc.conf has.

Well, I think it comes soon to a point, that I have to compare
/etc/rc.conf.site with /etc/rc.conf after a make world, to see,
if I want/need to merge new knobs into /etc/rc.conf.site.

In the good old days we had to compare /usr/src/etc/rc.conf with
/etc/rc.conf, which is exactly the same but with one difference...

We had a knifty tool named mergemaster, which helped us a lot,
to update /etc/rc.conf very easily. 

Now with an incomplete /etc/rc.conf.site, which contains only
a subset of knobs in /etc/rc.conf, you have to do it manually.

Well, kill me or not, but I have a certain feeling, that 
/etc/rc.conf.site is a bit drainbamaged in handling
	a) after a new installation
	b) if you have to keep track of changes, since it's
	   not mergemasters, it's your bloody manual task
	   to update it.

Well, maybe I overlooked some things advantages ;-) Then please tell me.

What do you think ? Or what are your experiences ?

	Andreas ///

-- 
Andreas Klemm                                http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
     What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ?
          http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
             "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs)      ``powered by FreeBSD SMP''

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990207170542.A90515>