Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:03:05 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore Message-ID: <200809171303.05759.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <48D0A683.9020802@FreeBSD.org> References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org> <48D03248.1040109@FreeBSD.org> <48D0A683.9020802@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:41:07 am Alex Dupre wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > John was referring to the problem of 'make config' not being called for > > ports being installed as dependencies of a port that has OPTIONS. > > John said (correct me if I'm wrong) that with an up-to-date system > OPTIONS doesn't correctly shows up (when the top port has OPTIONS), but > with an "old" system this worked. Reading the bsd.port.mk, the > "incriminated" CONFIG_DONE rows never changed since the introduction of > the OPTIONS support, so I think this *never* worked as expected. It used to work. I was just guessing about how it might not be working now based on reading the existing logic. I have not delved into the history to see what has changed. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809171303.05759.jhb>