Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:06:07 +1000 From: Jason Tubnor <jason@tubnor.net> To: FreeBSD virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bhyve win-guest benchmark comparing Message-ID: <CACLnyCKVN1LMSe2Y4h1Mh-549QSHKyZh1WDMV4E1cdH9guGEWQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200420090934.d6gkjg5er5ij36d2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de> References: <9e7f4c01-6cd1-4045-1a5b-69c804b3881b@omnilan.de> <f5a78199-9306-bccc-606a-23c30f56b0f1@omnilan.de> <20200419172345.Horde.alwm2Bn67wrcUt5a0zVjQ9f@app.eeeit.de> <69553fba-4ee5-67dc-a052-b58bb8100061@netfence.it> <20200420090934.d6gkjg5er5ij36d2@nexus.home.palmen-it.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, <felix@palmen-it.de> wrote: > > > Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already > > running as fast as possible. Correct? > > I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge > effect. > > > ^^^ This. Not all Xeon CPUs have vAPIC, especially the cheaper or workstation class so this may end up benefitting a lot of users. It turned our windows guest in their 1ru Xeon hosts into a different beast instantly. Cheers, Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACLnyCKVN1LMSe2Y4h1Mh-549QSHKyZh1WDMV4E1cdH9guGEWQ>