Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:04:15 -0700 From: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tail -f over NFS in -stable Message-ID: <3B0EC8CF.3DE4FEA2@DougBarton.net> References: <local.mail.freebsd-current/200009011622.JAA29262@csla.csl.sri.com> <local.mail.freebsd-current/20000902171753.A43451@magnesium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <200105251815.f4PIF7242701@prism.flugsvamp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> In article <local.mail.freebsd-current/3B0DD6BD.8E54A5E5@DougBarton.net> you write:
> > Blast from the past. This patch seemed reasonable to me at the time, but I
> >notice you didn't commit it. Any reason why? The issue has just come up
> >again on -questions.
>
> It shouldn't be needed.
Ok, your explanation makes perfect sense. I followed up to the user with a
little patch that'll tell him for sure if tail is trying to use kqueue or
not. I was just concerned that the problem seemed to have cropped back up,
but now I think that the user's problem is not in this area.
Thanks,
Doug
--
I need someone really bad. Are you really bad?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B0EC8CF.3DE4FEA2>