Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:49:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org> Subject: Re: install erroring out durning mergemaster... Message-ID: <42EC746A.7050401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050705234758.GR73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <200507031439.48288.Peter_Losher@isc.org> <20050705095859.GO73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200507051106.49609.Peter_Losher@isc.org> <20050705234758.GR73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Given the error you showed us, I would say you have NO_BIND_MTREE
> instead of NO_BIND_ETC in make.conf(5). This leads to not create
> /var/tmp/temproot/var/named/etc/namedb and then, it appears you do not
> have NO_BIND_ETC, because it tries to install files from src/etc/namedb
> (see src/etc/Makefile, distribution target).
>
> I don't know why this separation have been made.
Well, rather obviously because a person might want one, and not the other. I
tried to give maximum flexibility with the NO_BIND_* knobs, given the
desires that I imagined users might have, and what was expressed.
> I would say that if
> someone don't want Bind configuration files installed, he doesn't want
> to run mtree for its chroot either.
In the mergemaster case, this is a NOP because the empty directories will
just be deleted.
> Conversely, if he doesn't want to
> run mtree for chroot'd Bind, he certainly doesn't want to install its
> configuration files.
I wouldn't jump to that conclusion if I were you. :)
> I dare to Cc Doug Barton
Well, you came close, but the e-mail address you used wasn't exactly right.
I did pick this up on the list though, so I hope this is better late than
never.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42EC746A.7050401>