Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:23:36 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ian Lord <mailing-lists@msdi.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP? Message-ID: <20051231032336.GA65560@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20051229084332.0403ca58@Msdi.ca> References: <43B2F0A8.2030609@freebsd.org> <43B2F236.80903@rogers.com> <43B363FE.60906@obsecurity.org> <7.0.0.16.2.20051229084332.0403ca58@Msdi.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:45:34AM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > Then what's the point of ULE if it's slower then 4BSD ? Is it more=20 > stable, more... ? I compiled my kernel with ULE since I though it=20 > would be better but you are starting to make me regret my decision :)=20 > (I didn't benchmark both options, still in developpement right now,=20 > nothing in production) Partly research purposes, and it was originally hoped that it would be faster (and it probably was for a while). It needs more work, which is what is meant by "still experimental". Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDtfm3Wry0BWjoQKURAmkuAJwMntNLTbP0AqHkAHtC9Hs9HOzBiwCdG9Yi j6TXHZ5YzzPFJLLYL6+TsF4= =JFoT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051231032336.GA65560>