Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:37:44 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: KSE about to become a kernel option Message-ID: <20061027063744.GA33708@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <4541A5BB.8080908@freebsd.org> References: <20061026213343.GA29160@what-creek.com> <200610270851.39444.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20061027005733.GA31389@what-creek.com> <200610271006.38851.davidxu@freebsd.org> <c21e92e20610262320t4a06740bw6e483c6b8c2a492f@mail.gmail.com> <4541A5BB.8080908@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:22:51PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > Jiawei Ye wrote: > >On 10/27/06, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >>I assume that without KSE, the scheduler's code size is reduced, this > >>saves > >>I-CACHE and execution time. > >> > >>David Xu > > > >Is SCHED_CORE compatible with this change? I get > > > > I will fix it. Thanks. I deliberately left it out of my changes so that you could use it as a platform to optimise the !KSE/libthr case without KSE getting in the way for once. -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061027063744.GA33708>