Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:47:38 +1100 From: "Jan Mikkelsen" <janm@transactionware.com> To: "'Daichi GOTO'" <daichi@freebsd.org>, "'Mars G. Miro'" <marsgmiro@gmail.com>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, <ozawa@ongs.co.jp> Subject: RE: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) Message-ID: <001201c648bd$226b6440$0301a8c0@transactionware.com> In-Reply-To: <4418D84B.6090005@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daichi GOTO wrote: > All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions > and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) OK. How about a merge? I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE. Regards, Jan Mikkelsen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001201c648bd$226b6440$0301a8c0>