Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 10:26:56 +0200 From: Philippe Regnauld <regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CBQ, was: Bandwidth throttling etc. Message-ID: <19980427102656.58230@deepo.prosa.dk> In-Reply-To: <199804270749.PAA25765@spinner.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 03:49:47PM %2B0800 References: <199804270406.GAA24420@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> <199804270749.PAA25765@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm writes:
>
> Just as a by-the-way, an old open PR was just killed that had an
> implementation change to allow setsockopt() etc to use more than 108 bytes
> of data. (it was part of a much larger change to allow rule selection by
> uid and so on with ipfw. It's a shame it only got noticed on it's untimely
> death, I find that particular set of feature changes particularly
> interesting..)
Darn, that would have made a great base for an authenticated
firewall gateway...
Who had submitted the PR ? And was the "larger change" complete ?
--
-[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]-
«Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead
IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?»
- S. Kelly Bootle
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980427102656.58230>