Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:35:11 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: kreios@gmail.com Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers Message-ID: <20061025073511.GA90244@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <2de4f2a00610241959l7a96ed59je79fb3e978f2c3d9@mail.gmail.com> References: <2de4f2a00610241959l7a96ed59je79fb3e978f2c3d9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:59:57PM -0500, kreios@gmail.com wrote: > I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs > with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the > first results. The first tests are for serving up static data. > > System: > Supermicro PDSMi Motherboard > 1G Memory > Intel Pentium D CPU 3.40GHz > Intel Gigibit NIC > Bind 9.2.3 > > OS UP UP+P MP MP+P MP+TP MP+TT MP+TP+P > MP+TT+P > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > FreeBSD 4.11 28455 28370 28976 X X X X X > FreeBSD 6.1 29074 34260 34635 35730 17846 38780 19776 > 44188 > FreeBSD Stable 30190 34707 33294 36651 18893 39374 19449 > 44169 > FreeBSD Current 30707 34029 32300 33689 15535 40554 13886 > 42071 > Ubuntu 6.06 X X X X X 37294 X X I see regression between -current and -stable. are you sure you tested without any debuging stuff? some performance speedups went in in 7-current also - do you use the same config everywhere? -current GENERIC doesnt have COMPAT_43 for example which miht affect performance (additional locking) etc. roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061025073511.GA90244>