Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:00:27 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How about gcj? (Re: Not committing WARNS settings...) Message-ID: <20020206110027.C98054@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200202061805.g16I5JQ07324@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500 References: <20020206092406.F96921@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202061805.g16I5JQ07324@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want to > > turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with this. > > There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25 minutes to compile on a fast > > 1.2 GHz Athlon. > > That's the thing. gcc30 port, essentially, installs a copy of the > compiler already available as part of the base. No it doesn't. 3.0.3 is a very different compiler from 2.95.3. > But the base is missing > gcj (the port does too for now), so one would be forced to add the port. And the base system does not NEED a java compiler. > Can we have those installed, at least, to ease the work of the future > porter? Nope. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020206110027.C98054>