Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:48:02 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8). Message-ID: <3F6B1722.7000701@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <20030919121014.GD386@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030918152942.5c7163df.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030918234442.51921f77.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <20030918221319.GD1558@FreeBSD.org> <20030919133900.451a3f5d.ltning@anduin.net> <20030919121014.GD386@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > As mentioned by Tom's original mail that isn't possible due to the qmail > license. You can go bug djb about it :-) (though I doubt it will change > anything). > > Note, the license is the reason why qmail isn't included, it's not a > crusade against qmail - I also use qmail myself some places. Note: in my view the problem is that the current port maintainer has decided to produce an install that is not conformant with Dan's license granting an exception to the requirement for his approval. It is entirely possible to make a binary package that either: meets with his approval, or; fulfills the requirements for the exemption. I've contacted him directly on the matter. If you like, I'll put together binary packages for RELEASE_4.8, RELEASE_4.9, RELEASE_5.1, and RELEASE_5.2.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F6B1722.7000701>