Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:33:34 +0200
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Speed improvements in ZFS
Message-ID:  <ed1f82dd26d3cc9ec9cc16505109ec40@Leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGudoHG5Fgg4184SsXhzqYRR7VPaBXZoirGvyRyJX5ihX5YG-A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <61ca9df1b15c0e5477ff51196d0ec073@Leidinger.net> <CAGudoHG5Fgg4184SsXhzqYRR7VPaBXZoirGvyRyJX5ihX5YG-A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 2023-08-15 14:41, schrieb Mateusz Guzik:

> With this in mind can you provide: sysctl kern.maxvnodes
> vfs.wantfreevnodes vfs.freevnodes vfs.vnodes_created vfs.numvnodes
> vfs.recycles_free vfs.recycles

After a reboot:
kern.maxvnodes: 10485760
vfs.wantfreevnodes: 2621440
vfs.freevnodes: 24696
vfs.vnodes_created: 1658162
vfs.numvnodes: 173937
vfs.recycles_free: 0
vfs.recycles: 0

> Meanwhile if there is tons of recycles, you can damage control by
> bumping kern.maxvnodes.

Looks like there are not much free directly after the reboot. I will 
check the values tomorrow after the periodic run again and maybe 
increase by 10 or 100 so see if it makes a difference.

> If this is not the problem you can use dtrace to figure it out.

dtrace-count on vnlru_read_freevnodes() and vnlru_free_locked()? Or 
something else?

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org    netchild@FreeBSD.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ed1f82dd26d3cc9ec9cc16505109ec40>