Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:38:49 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Still no XFree86-4? Message-ID: <p05111720b95a79fbc5df@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <1026869258.474.103.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> References: <3D33EFC5.7010407@veidit.net> <1026861953.474.18.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> <1026869258.474.103.camel@anholt.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:27 PM -0600 7/16/02, Eric Anholt wrote: >It notably doesn't include md5summing of Wraphelp.c. If I can >find what's the 'best' Wraphelp.c (and most legal? What's the >status of wraphelp importing/exporting?), I'll switch it. Is >there any circumstance when someone wouldn't have access to >Wraphelp.c? I thought the whole point of Wraphelp.c was that the person who runs the machine (whatever machine X is being installed on) has to obtain that file, so they would have to explicitly verify that they -- personally -- have the right to use it. Mind you, I did that once about seven years ago, and I just keep copying that Wraphelp.c around to wherever I need it. I have no idea what the current requirement is... :-) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05111720b95a79fbc5df>