Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:07:31 GMT From: Paolo Pisati <piso@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 101845 for review Message-ID: <200607181107.k6IB7Vf1040641@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=101845 Change 101845 by piso@piso_newluxor on 2006/07/18 11:07:29 Defining an interrupt handler as INTR_FAST means the interrupt thread associated to this interrupt event won't be created: actually with filter+ithread, we need that thread. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/dev/em/if_em.c#7 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2006/intr_filter/dev/em/if_em.c#7 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ */ TASK_INIT(&sc->link_task, 0, em_handle_link, sc); if ((error = bus_setup_intr(dev, sc->res_interrupt, - INTR_TYPE_NET | INTR_FAST, em_intr_fast, em_handle_rxtx, sc, + INTR_TYPE_NET, em_intr_fast, em_handle_rxtx, sc, &sc->int_handler_tag)) != 0) { device_printf(dev, "Failed to register fast interrupt " "handler: %d\n", error);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607181107.k6IB7Vf1040641>