Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:54:57 -0400 From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Roland van Laar <roland@micite.net> Cc: ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: security/py-kerberos Message-ID: <1432E901-3CE0-40D2-A061-47D3626666F7@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <5515D45E.2010803@micite.net> References: <AF0DE9E5-7B67-4846-9A7A-F6C076B8EAD5@langille.org> <5515CD55.3040203@micite.net> <7AC0D3B1-32EB-4732-BD7F-7258FD068992@langille.org> <5515D20D.4010802@micite.net> <5515D279.8090406@micite.net> <4FF6BD31-447E-4EE0-8A66-8385D686424D@langille.org> <5515D45E.2010803@micite.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Roland van Laar <roland@micite.net> = wrote: >=20 > On 27-03-15 23:02, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Roland van Laar <roland@micite.net> = wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 27-03-15 22:56, Roland van Laar wrote: >>>> On 27-03-15 22:39, Dan Langille wrote: >>>>>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Roland van Laar <roland@micite.net> = wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 27-03-15 21:11, Dan Langille wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Why does security/py-kerberos require security/krb5? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I ask because we already have Kerberos in base. Why do we need = two installations of Kerberos? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I'm confused. :/ >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I ask because I just added security/py-requests-kerberos to the = tree. >>>>>> py-kerberos depends on gssapi/gssapi_generic.h. >>>>>> This file isn't included in the base kerberos, but it is in the = security/krb5 port. >>>>> I see. >>>>>=20 >>>>> So we need it only for compiling, not for running? >>>> ;-) I haven't tried running it without the krb5 package. >>> The resulting python module is: kerberos.so. >>> Which actually depends on libkrb5support.so from security/krb5 >>> See: >>>=20 >>> # ldd ./kerberos.so >>> ./kerberos.so: >>> libpython2.7.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libpython2.7.so.1 = (0x801606000) >>> libgssapi_krb5.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so = (0x8019c1000) >>> libkrb5.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so (0x801c08000) >>> libk5crypto.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libk5crypto.so (0x801ee8000) >>> libcom_err.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcom_err.so (0x802117000) >>> libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80081f000) >>> libthr.so.3 =3D> /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80231a000) >>> libintl.so.9 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 (0x80253f000) >>> libutil.so.9 =3D> /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x802748000) >>> libm.so.5 =3D> /lib/libm.so.5 (0x80295a000) >>> libkrb5support.so =3D> /usr/local/lib/libkrb5support.so = (0x802b82000) >> That looks like what I found on my server after installing. >>=20 >>>>> I want to avoid having two Kerberos installed on the server. :) >> I wonder why it needs security/krb5 and can't use Kerberos from base. = It seems odd to me... >=20 > In what way is it odd? > The base kerberos is a different one than the MIT one. > py-kerberos is developed by Apple for their calendarserver software = and I think they just > used the MIT implementation. Here's a patch so it works with Base and with heimdal too. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199123 =E2=80=94=20 Dan Langille http://langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1432E901-3CE0-40D2-A061-47D3626666F7>