Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:09:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support Message-ID: <20040222170903.GA91129@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040222074403.GB33450@dan.emsphone.com> References: <87u11p8sl6.fsf@gray.impulse.net> <20040222055417.GA3941@dragon.nuxi.com> <1077429634.98580.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040222074403.GB33450@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:44:03AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 22), Joe Marcus Clarke said: > > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 00:54, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > > > WHY in the world is there even a /usr/local/etc/rc.subr ??? > > > /etc/rc.subr on 5-CURRENT is perfectly fine. > > > > It was needed for a short time to workaround a package problem on > > bento. As of the last round of bsd.*.mk changes, this is no longer the > > case. /etc/rc.subr is used where it exists. > > Also needed for 4.x systems. Please read "on 5-CURRENT". It was a pruely 5-CURRENT statement.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222170903.GA91129>