Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:25:01 -0500 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org> Cc: "Nikolay Y. Orlyuk" <nikolay@asu.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build options for kernel modules Message-ID: <20030321162501.GC1174@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20030321161658.GA56375@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20030321153217.GA53518@comp.chem.msu.su> <20030321153907.GQ76182@asu.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> <20030321161658.GA56375@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 07:16:58PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:39:07PM +0200, Nikolay Y. Orlyuk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:32:17PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >=20
> > > Excuse my stupid question, but I seem to have no time to do the
> > > investigation by myself right now so I'd be glad to receive a brief
> > > answer from someone who has the information.
> > >=20
> > > As far as I can see, kernel modules should be built along with the
> > > kernel for the only reason of keeping their mutual interfaces in
> > > sync, has a source file defining such an interface changed. Is
> > > there currently no way to go further and affect a kernel module's
> > > built-in features with kernel config file options, besides modifying
> > > makefiles in /sys/modules?
> > I think this isn't so. I have been already tried to compile some modules
> > without compiling kernel and this trye has successful result, but witho=
ut
> > change options.
> > I think modules must be build with same or less imports and same or mor=
e export to be correct
> > for loading.
>=20
> Yeah, it's all right to compile modules w/o the kernel, but that's
> not exactly what I was asking about. My question was whether "option
> FOO" lines from a kernel configuration file could influence modules.
I'm pretty sure they do. A great example is IPFIREWALL_* options: if
they don't influence the module, I think we have a problem. ;)
A.
--=20
Advertisers, not governments, are the primary censors of media content=20
in the United States today.
- C. Edwin Baker
http://www.ad-mad.co.uk/quotes/freespeech.htm
--KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+ezzdttcWHAnWiGcRAiSwAJ9VguTVLfAKTdLApBeNqYk2j2T6WACfbEeb
32scoLHMccJwCTkYViC2OMQ=
=GbHo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030321162501.GC1174>