Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:37:10 -0300 From: William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> Cc: koobs@freebsd.org, mainland@apeiron.net, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: py-imaging vs. py-pillow Message-ID: <CAHtVNLNs_tm8cg6xu3N_DAQ8O=LPk3VOH_sAVp-nJgwQBniFkQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <542E677A.7080205@gmx.net> References: <542E677A.7080205@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Coexist how? They are essentially the same package. I don't see how thats possible. py-imaging is deprecated, they should be switched to py-pillow and thats it. On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> wrote: > According to freshports there are about 10 ports that depend on py-pilllow > and 50 that depend on py-imaging. > > py-imaging conflicts with py-pilllow. E.g., calibre and xmbc cannot be > installed at the same time. > > > I noticed the problem because calibre switched to py-pilllow recently. > There really should be a way that these packages can coexist. > > (py-imaging/py-pilllow maintainers CCed) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- William Grzybowski / wg FreeBSD Ports Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHtVNLNs_tm8cg6xu3N_DAQ8O=LPk3VOH_sAVp-nJgwQBniFkQ>