Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:53:52 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Freebsd vs. linux Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEGDFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <823196404.20050212105644@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Anthony > Atkielski > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 1:57 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Freebsd vs. linux > > > > Could you please either explain, why Freebsd is superior to > Linux, (I am > > asking this as I would like to understand, in more depth, why it is > > better) or direct me to a source that might give me some further > > reading on the subject. > > The main reason why I consider Linux inferior to FreeBSD is that Linux > is only a kernel, whereas FreeBSD is a complete OS. > > Linus Torvalds originally wrote only the kernel portion of an operating > system. He wrote it from scratch ------------^ allegedly wrote it from scratch. SCO feels differently. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEGDFAAA.tedm>