Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:07:49 +0600 From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, perryh@pluto.rain.com, mike@sentex.net Subject: Re: Problem with igb(4) updated to version 2.0.7 Message-ID: <4CFA04E5.1060209@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimk3gg8GSkjQ3Z0TxRa924M33bDoiD_Mp9759ft@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimWVJhtu8LrZ_tn0Tdr-vs9PmPnW9SjebT7jnyM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik%2B4Ag1HYXDWJvn2fTx6M%2Bpa9o29-A8j6qVRhZ_@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikwcRW%2BdqY=NTSbJsr3daEd-8usPo0Rw%2BhA_D-8@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin3%2BbCaXoPxTQsvzmqgtpA1zSY8f17Qh-nqymPw@mail.gmail.com> <201011270946271408828@yahoo.com.cn> <AANLkTikG8RJQw%2Bh1SHZPs1cHGrM%2B3LfniZrdLqVoPVtr@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=YjG40%2BDj7471wyv3aeXGJgoL1GC33iNaypsrW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=LgejYxRXnxLtkvB-Qfp2u%2BtySdriWHfGWPQjL@mail.gmail.com> <20101128081617.GA90332@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <AANLkTinF1fovumkeXxWgaKi_bNiUCnqgWAtdaCaXELzO@mail.gmail.com> <4CF73A2C.7000802@rdtc.ru> <4CF89EE7.8020807@rdtc.ru> <AANLkTi=6N3Rz57YVNF1ZiDGEexnEXWr6oNPz9F=c2GpA@mail.gmail.com> <4CF93A77.30804@rdtc.ru> <4CF9470F.4020709@sentex.net> <4CF947D4.10504@rdtc.ru> <AANLkTin7hfqqwkudNHhrsyS_O7_-PCXffAWT1N85i31f@mail.gmail.com> <4cf9ef71./9OtjLOA2%2BIV0UUh%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <AANLkTimk3gg8GSkjQ3Z0TxRa924M33bDoiD_Mp9759ft@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04.12.2010 14:28, Jack Vogel wrote: > LOL, ya, I have one of those switches that takes that long, a > Dell 5224, takes some getting used to when you're used to > back to back speeds :) > > There hasn't been any crying for this feature so I'm disinclined, > however if more than 1 or two want it I would reconsider. Most of time switch may be (and should be) reconfigured to skip this STP timeout for ports connected to routers (portfast for Cisco, edge port for D-Link etc.) Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CFA04E5.1060209>