Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:48:27 +0100
From:      Martin Nilsson <martin@gneto.com>
To:        JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: amd64 slower than i386 on identical AMD 64 system?
Message-ID:  <441A4DAB.4030800@gneto.com>
In-Reply-To: <200603161705.17351.joao@matik.com.br>
References:  <200603140740.38388.joao@matik.com.br>	<4419AC9B.6000804@rogers.com>	<1142536279.77351.5.camel@triton.mcneil.com> <200603161705.17351.joao@matik.com.br>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

JoaoBR wrote:
> with 2GB no problem, 
>  3GB I do not know but 4GB is when the problem appears here for me
> 
> 
>> Wonder if there is some sort of memory pairing issue. To get >2GB and
>> <4GB I'd think you have to have 2 1GB sticks and 2 512MB sticks or
>> something like that.
> 
> no it isn't in my case, I use real good dual-channel 2x (2x1GB)  suggested 
> memory listed in the MB manual

With 4GB memory you will likely get some memory remapped above 4GB, 
could your problems be caused by a buggy driver that doesn't support 
memory over the 4GB barrier correctly? (The ata driver comes to mind)

/Martin




home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?441A4DAB.4030800>