Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:16:12 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> To: Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org> Cc: imp@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: c2e9c5bbf022 - main - tpm: Refactor TIS and add a SPI attachment Message-ID: <ZnniHBI7bg--g8pV@cell.glebi.us> In-Reply-To: <20240624161128.33c0f518@ralga.knownspace> References: <202405032032.443KWhf0045034@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <ZnnMBXi2sGdtc_67@cell.glebi.us> <20240624161128.33c0f518@ralga.knownspace>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:11:28PM -0400, Justin Hibbits wrote: J> > sorry for late notice, but we just discovered that after this commit J> > tpm(4) on ACPI no longer attaches. From what I see ther probe method J> > isn't even called. J> J> Hi Gleb, J> J> That's very odd. The probe method hasn't changed, nor has the tpm_acpi J> attachment (still acpi), so I'm really confused why it wouldn't be J> called now. Is there any debugging you can do to further narrow it J> down? I haven't seen any issues reported internally at Juniper on x86 J> hardware. I just verified everything should get built properly. I started adding printfs to the probe method and as said - it is not even called. So I puzzled on where to start the debugging. I can test patches/ideas if you have any. Warner is also looking into this problem. -- Gleb Smirnoff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZnniHBI7bg--g8pV>