Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:56:02 -0400 From: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> Subject: Re: BeagleBone slow inbound net I/O Message-ID: <2B027037-09EF-4552-9AE2-FC6E51090866@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150313131700.GA34648@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <20150311165115.32327c5a@ivory.wynn.com> <20150312133433.GB28385@cicely7.cicely.de> <20150312232641.4365263d@ivory.wynn.com> <E5292790-BAE2-41BC-BC76-A31C3C7ED76B@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <20150313131700.GA34648@cicely7.cicely.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mar 13, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:34:59AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:26 PM, Brett Wynkoop <freebsd-arm@wynn.com> wrote: >> >>> Greeting- >>> >>> It is confirmed, the net I/O is much slower than reading from the SD >>> card. Here is another run of tar - pipe - tar, but this time the >>> source is the sd card and the destination is still the USB zfs. >> >> >> The Beaglebone uses a USB NIC so any I/O to/from SD card will be competing for resources and potentially slowing things down. > > No it does not. My mistake; I was confusing it with the Raspberry Pi. Network performance hasn't been too great on the Raspberry Pi in my experience. Maybe it has improved lately, though. Cheers, Paul.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2B027037-09EF-4552-9AE2-FC6E51090866>