Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:46:00 -0000 From: Dennis Berger <Dennis.Berger@BSDsystems.de> To: pf4freebsd@freelists.org Subject: [pf4freebsd] Re: pfaltq-fbsd merge Message-ID: <3F3E542D.3050709@BSDsystems.de> In-Reply-To: <1061048776.3f3e51c82b96a@mail.fluidhosting.com> References: <3F3E18A0.2020607@BSDsystems.de> <3F3E1A4D.1070309@BSDsystems.de> <1061048776.3f3e51c82b96a@mail.fluidhosting.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
pf-r@solarflux.org wrote:
>Hi,
>
>ok, now I'm starting to get interested in this... Is the functionality the same
>now as pf 1.61 + ALTQ 0.4.1? Any differences? Also, what's the best way to
>remove the separate pieces completely before installing the merged offering?
>
>
1. It's clean design because we removed lots of reduntant code pfaltq
for example...
2. we introduced latest ALTQ from kame altq 0.4.2 was based on altq
shipped with altq-freebsd-release-5.0
3. the versions are PF 1.61 + latest fixes in CVS (upcoming 1.62) +
latest ALTQ from kame
4. adding pf+altq to the basesystem ist much easier... hopefully
Regards,
Dennis
>-S
>
>
>Quoting Dennis Berger <Dennis.Berger@BSDsystems.de>:
>
>
>
>>Dennis Berger wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Max and I are pround to announce pfaltq version 0.3 for FreeBSD 5.1.
>>>Here is the first official release of our PF ALTQ merge. It's based on
>>>the most recent version of OpenBSD's PF. The ALTQ part in this package
>>>is based on the most recent version from kame. We disabled ALTQ3_COMPAT,
>>>and introduced finegrained locking. JoBS, other schedulers and
>>>compatparts are still in this tree for two reasons. First it's much
>>>easier to sync with kame. Second we will start work to support JoBS, we
>>>are in contact with the author. This release is working on FreeBSD 5.1
>>>at any patchlevel.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F3E542D.3050709>