Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 22:04:43 -0500 (EST) From: Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net> To: FreeBSD Security <security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SSH or Telnet? Message-ID: <20020329220256.N38382-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200203291145.OAA03776@paranoid.eltex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 ark@eltex.ru wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> What's wrong with telnet? I use it frequently and i am pretty satisified with
> it.
>
> (I don't need to encrypt sessions, there is no sensitive information inside.
> Don't tell me about cleartext passwords, there are no cleartext passwords.
Have a look at ethereal or dsniff. You will be surprised.
> And if you really need encryption you may run telnet over ipsec)
IPsec is a VPN solution. If someone in the LAN to which you're
VPN-ing is running a sniffer, then what?
--
Chris BeHanna
Software Engineer (Remove "bogus" before responding.)
behanna@bogus.zbzoom.net
I was raised by a pack of wild corn dogs.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020329220256.N38382-100000>