Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:51:47 +0000 From: John <freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: release or stable, for wifi Message-ID: <20140211105147.GA29770@potato.growveg.org> In-Reply-To: <20140211183943.7036dcf1@X220.alogt.com> References: <20140211103131.GA27302@potato.growveg.org> <20140211183943.7036dcf1@X220.alogt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:39:43PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:31 +0000 > John <freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org> wrote: > > > Hello list, > > > > Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The > > situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because > > it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of > > reliability. Wireless is provided by the ath0 driver. > > I am on 10 since June/July 2012. It was HEAD then. I will stay with 10 > as long as possible and the switch to the then HEAD. I do this since > many years and find it the easiest way for me. I had a feeling this might be the case, thanks for confirming. -- John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140211105147.GA29770>