Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:50:01 -0800 (PST) From: darklogik <darklogik@pittgoth.com> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/35903: physio(9) does not have an AUTHOR section Message-ID: <200203150550.g2F5o1V24844@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/35903; it has been noted by GNATS. From: darklogik <darklogik@pittgoth.com> To: dima@trit.org Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/35903: physio(9) does not have an AUTHOR section Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 00:30:06 +0008 (EST) Not that an arguement needs started, or a dispute needs to arise, but may I throw the following idea on the table for everyones evauluation: No author listed, who would be contacted if this manual document became out of date, who would fix it? Who already knows about it? Could we just dub Hiten, as the last person who worked with it, the current author and maintainer of this document? It would be good, in my opinion of course, for users to have an idea of who to contact if in fact this document needs changing. Many times we get prs saying ``this needs changed'' and yet it either sits for many days/weeks until someone has the time to investigate the problem, or knowledge to apply a quick fix? In closing, I guess that this is just a request to assign Hiten as the author of this document, and maybe even list an (unknown origin) under the authors section. Is this idea feasable? -- Tom (Darklogik) Rhodes To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203150550.g2F5o1V24844>