Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:39:24 -0700
From:      Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ruby floating point problem in FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA1
Message-ID:  <86r3c4o0lv.fsf@elm.localnet>
In-Reply-To: <868tyosjzz.fsf@elm.localnet> (Carl Johnson's message of "Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:59:44 -0700")
References:  <86mvn6rqab.fsf@elm.localnet> <CAOQrpVdQ%2BH-TD-JsU%2BSO5YEkt_YQo7EHOMxh=Csx=V2n0prXog@mail.gmail.com> <868tyosjzz.fsf@elm.localnet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org> writes:

> Tom Vijlbrief <tvijlbrief@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I had similar issues (core dumps) with Python.
>>
>> Recompiling the ports fixed it for me.
>>
>> Note that portmaster gave me some issues, because the old port has to be=
 deinstalled first. Just a "make" in the
>> ports source did not work in all cases.
>>
>> What worked for me was:
>>
>> make deinstall reinstall clean
>>
>> In each /usr/ports/* directory, starting with the supporting libs
>
> Thanks for the information, but I think I will wait for a while and see
> if a new package build comes out that fixes the problem.  The RPi's are
> slow enough that I hate to build all packages unless I have to.
>
>> Op di 31 mei 2016 23:47 schreef Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org>:
>>
>>     Hello,
>>=20=20=20=20
>>     I just upgraded an RPi2 system to the 11.0-ALPHA1 and noticed that a
>>     fractional second sleep in ruby causes SIGABRT.=C2=A0 I assume that =
is due to
>>     the softfp to hardfp transition, but it appears that the available
>>     packages are still softfp.=C2=A0 I just checked and found that print=
ing fp
>>     numbers from ruby works.=C2=A0 Anybody have any comments about wheth=
er this
>>     is expected due to the transition?
>>=20=20=20=20
>>     Thanks for any information.

I just installed packages from the newest build and ruby now works
properly.  I am a little confused about the package architecture still
showing softfp (Architecture : freebsd:11:armv6:32:el:eabi:softfp).  Is
that really the new version that actually uses hardfp?

Thanks for any information.

--=20
Carl Johnson		carlj@peak.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r3c4o0lv.fsf>