Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:11:52 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: WARNS granularity Message-ID: <20011204131152.A73842@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
IMO our WARNS values {0,1,2} are not granular enough.
I would like to make 1 ==> -Werror only. This would help prevent
regressions with sources that do not produces warnings with the default
GCC warnings.
WARNS=2 would add:
-Wall
I think having a WARNS level that is just -Wall is useful as -Wall is the
most common thing GCC users compile with if they use any warnings at all.
WARNS=3 would be the same as today's `1', which adds:
-W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wno-uninitialized
WARNS=4 would be the same as today's `2', which adds:
-Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow
Objections? Improvements to the idea?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011204131152.A73842>