Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 04:29:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regarding pciids Message-ID: <29707595.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20100914005946.GA7417@freebsd.org> References: <20100914005946.GA7417@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Best-4 wrote: > > any thoughts on using http://pciids.sourceforge.net/ for pciids instead of > the > Hart and Boemler lists. the SF site seems to be updated more regularly and > would get rid of the need to decide for each entry, whether to take the > Hart or > Boemler one. > > right now tools/tools/pciid/mk_pci_vendors.pl favours long descriptions > over > short ones which means that something like: > > 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller (8086)' > > will get discarded in favor of > > 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller working fine with > http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte (8086)' > +1, since I'm the one[1] with (well, not the only one, ICH9 should be quite popular) "http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte" device. best regards, - Jakub Lach [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=748866+0+archive/2010/freebsd-stable/20100912.freebsd-stable -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/regarding-pciids-tp29704378p29707595.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29707595.post>