Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:10:59 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to BSD.*.dist Message-ID: <20040330111059.GA48428@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040330105948.GA48082@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpisgmwurw.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpr7vavc9a.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330105948.GA48082@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 02:59:48PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Alternatvely, do you mean direct mtree calls by ports themselfs (i.e. > bypassing bsd.port.mk)? In this situation ports should be fixed to use > bsd.port.mk instead. Alternatively, do you maybe mean that people directly calls mtree by hand before port installing? It is not supported way to get right directories in anycase and not worth to broke mtree -L, of course. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040330111059.GA48428>