Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:35:24 +0100
From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@wwu.de>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [patch] extending {amd64|i386} cpu info
Message-ID: <20100227223524.GU8200@hoeg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <permail-2010022703194680e26a0b00002027-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
References: <permail-2010022703194680e26a0b00002027-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hello Alexander,
* Alexander Best <alexbestms@wwu.de> wrote:
> + printf(" Stepping = %u"
> + " Model = %u"
> + " Family = %u",
> + cpu_id & CPUID_STEPPING,
> + CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id),
> + CPUID_TO_FAMILY(cpu_id));
So is there some reason why we don't have a CPUID_TO_STEPPING()?
Greetings,
--
Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuJniwACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWwFgCeJhHX0OH7OeJAbf6HzDLhH9Qn
tTsAnjIo/zLqJK/1A21uQlMbbAawEYRn
=oPmt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100227223524.GU8200>