Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:14:24 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= BLOT <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg Message-ID: <1476425664.4864.2.camel@unix-experience.fr> In-Reply-To: <57FFB185.6030601@quip.cz> References: <638fe078-80db-2492-90be-f1280eb8d445@freebsd.org> <20161012092403.66a41d9e@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <00f3768e-f57a-661c-aa62-89cdf10926bd@netfence.it> <CAO%2BPfDfLtw6OjPvrMC5hzfEL1CH7wyLZ0=RQstqZrRmOmk5pxA@mail.gmail.com> <57FFB185.6030601@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FreeBSD ports are complicated ? Does someone of you tryed to do a Debian package, it's even more complicated as you should modify many path, split package in multiple packages, do the service engineering with systemV or systemD, etc ? -- Best regards, Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network engineer http://www.unix-experience.fr Le jeudi 13 octobre 2016 à 18:08 +0200, Miroslav Lachman a écrit : > David Demelier wrote on 2016/10/13 14:42: > > 2016-10-12 10:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>: > > > On 10/12/16 09:24, Matthieu Volat wrote: > > > > > > > And GNU/Linuxes can be a PITA when you have to track -dev(el) > > > > packages > > > > (which sometimes really requires -bin, -app or whatever), or > > > > worst, describe > > > > to people how they are supposed to build your software with > > > > weird subpackage > > > > names. > > > > > > > > I really like that ports provides the software project as > > > > intended by > > > > upstream (modulo options). > > > > > > > > > Just a "me too" here! > > > > Could not agree more. > > > > Please forget that idea. > > > > I just hate having to install libfoo, libfoo-dev, libfoo-dbg, > > libfoo-doc, libfoo-whatever each time I need to develop on Linux. > > Please do not transform FreeBSD as a Linux distribution :) > > > > I love the way FreeBSD and some very sparse Linux distributions > > provide the packages exactly how it would be installed by hand (= > > vanilla). > > > > FreeBSD offers some options and very few changes for better > > integration but packages are provided vanilla. You want a package? > > You > > install /packagename/ nothing more, nothing less. I really would > > like > > to see simple vanilla packages for the next 10 years. > > > > The FreeBSD ports is already extremely complicated, do not make it > > even harder :( > > +1 for this! > > Miroslav Lachman > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.o > rg"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1476425664.4864.2.camel>