Date: 21 Dec 2007 12:31:18 +0100 From: vermaden <vermaden@interia.pl> To: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default route Message-ID: <20071221113118.AC6813C2BA@f04.poczta.interia.pl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:20:53PM +0100, vermaden wrote:
> > > After reading this I feel that you have absolutely no packets on
> > > either interfaces when your Linux box ping FreeBSD. But this
> > > contradicts with your previous assertion that if ICMP packet comes
> > > in on rl1, then it is reflected at rl0. Am I missing something?
> >
> > Yes I must mislook that, rl0 also is 'dead' while Linux box pings
> > my FreeBSD box using net on rl1.
>
> OK, so I feel that there are two points to check.
>
> 1. Firewall. Even if you're running GENERIC, firewall thingies
> are compiled as kernel modules and can be loaded by the startup
> scripts. The output of 'kldstat -v' will show what modules
> are loaded. BPF is run before filtering, so it sees packets
> that firewall can drop.
>
> 2. Enable ICMP verbose mode in the kernel: set the variable
> 'icmpprintfs' on the top of the /sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c
> to 1 and define ICMPPRINTFS during kernel compilation via
> 'makeoptions ICMPPRINTFS=1'. After this you should watch for
> kernel messages with the 'icmp' at the beginning of the line.
>
> Hope this helps.
> --
> Eygene
First of all thanks for still trying to solve my problem.
Ad 1. Firewall is not enabled/loaded,
no firewall in kernel or as a module.
Ad 2. Thanks for that option, I will try this
after 26.12 (after christmas) I think
and I will post the results here.
Regards
vermaden
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tysiace smiesznych filmikow z sieci.
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1ca7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071221113118.AC6813C2BA>