Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:54:52 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: ache@nagual.pp.ru (=?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?=) Cc: jfieber@indiana.edu, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc master.passwd Message-ID: <199710272054.VAA18661@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971027233220.1840A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> from "[______ ______]" at "Oct 27, 97 11:38:37 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Yes, but Apache not relay on complex things like default umask etc and > uses their own. As I see 'limits' does all job needed by Apache. > > BTW, if you know better way to set login class things inside shell script, > I think there is no harm to use it. > My way is > eval `limits -e -C daemon` > line at the start of apachectl script. > Which line you suggest instead? I completely agre with you here. It seems the best way to do this for apache. What I tried to say was that the extra switch for su would be usefull in other cases, and that why I made it. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710272054.VAA18661>