Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:18:14 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Anders Andersson <anders@sanyusan.se>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make includes Message-ID: <20020514121814.G31896@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020514131051.GA81899@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.org on Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:10:51PM %2B0300 References: <20020513203331.A15497@gateway.sanyusan.se> <20020514062118.GC34081@sunbay.com> <20020514150128.A1599@gateway.sanyusan.se> <20020514131051.GA81899@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:10:51PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Why change in the first place?
> >
> > What was wrong with 'make includes'? Why break POLA?
> >
> They were broken. See commit log for share/mk/bsd.incs.mk,v 1.1 for
> a full story.
I fail to see how they were broken from the rev 1.1 bsd.incs.mk log.
It looks like you just hyjacked the `includes' target. Why could you not
have used `incbuild' and `incinstall'? Then includes is something like
includes: incbuild incinstall
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020514121814.G31896>