Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:36:48 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Thoughts on Variant Symlinks; was Thoughts on Multi-Symlink Concept Message-ID: <530A4DD0.2020904@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <530A47BD.6040704@digiware.nl> References: <CAO2cuEMC==HstC4VkkiFpHyo6LA_xyCjYKvCEECXneVLNnZpZg@mail.gmail.com> <A31B3F88-861F-459B-AD67-F146D5514594@mail.turbofuzz.com> <530049a1.XXZ1PjZFgRyCu9X6%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <53092D83.6050603@digiware.nl> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1402231016290.15984@sea.ntplx.net> <20140223173042.074d3eb0@ernst.home> <530A47BD.6040704@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Another veteran of Domain/OS here. Isn't it time to change the subject of this thread? Variant symlinks are quite distinct from what the OP was proposing (one "link" concatenates a plurality of files). -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?530A4DD0.2020904>