Date: 30 Mar 1996 09:48:44 GMT From: graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Graichen) To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. Message-ID: <4jj01t$1mv@mordillo.physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <199603291819.MAA24109@compound>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Kimball (alk@Think.COM) wrote:
: From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
: Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500
: > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal?
: Because the network address families they supported are no longer
: shipped, and thus they won't compile any more.
: Please, that isn't good enough to justify the cost. Stub them to
: return errors.
i would vote for this too
t
--
thomas graichen graichen@mail.physik.fu-berlin.de graichen@FreeBSD.org
perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when
there is no longer anything to take away antoine de saint-exupery
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4jj01t$1mv>