Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:44:01 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset channel 5 (2432 Mhz, flags 0x3e0 hal flags 0x140) Message-ID: <200604261844.01739.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <444F974B.2060108@errno.com> References: <200604252258.k3PMwJ74026969@monk.cnd.dundas.on.ca> <200604260905.04706.joao@matik.com.br> <444F974B.2060108@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:52, Sam Leffler wrote: > > No. releng5 has an older hal that does not even support regdomain 18. > Backporting work to releng5 would be a massive effort for very little > gain; anyone that truly wants wireless support should be running 6.x or > later. > ok and agree but 5 is not that bad if you do not need all the encryption st= uff=20 and probably better than 6.0 (not releng_6), I am talking hostap here. releng_6 has some working improvements now which are in big parts your work= I=20 guess since I found that rate_onoe makes ath hostap stable I have now some boxes = out=20 and they are almost 10 days under load and running best switch for me actually is -apbridge unfortunatly if_bridge still does not convince in practice but bridge is fi= ne=20 now anyway I think it's great work so far thank's Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604261844.01739.joao>