Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:36:16 +0200
From:      Olivier Certner <olivier.freebsd@free.fr>
To:        Julien Cigar <julien@perdition.city>
Cc:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Poudriere and Python FLAVORS
Message-ID:  <2210609.NtcAQq7lVP@ravel>
In-Reply-To: <lnqv3saoei3t6yfgcjttyvsd2sge2xpdh3l7247gnifzli6mkv@ikycn23so37v>
References:  <6amrdwe3seijb2qz7xjtbxkrldhkftrrfmsdqh3lopl7e4yx3k@u6bahg4f3s4l> <zt6xfastbfa7l6egqxfhhguekeksslhgt3sebhu7cekpklpbow@y5bp6tp7ngjb> <lnqv3saoei3t6yfgcjttyvsd2sge2xpdh3l7247gnifzli6mkv@ikycn23so37v>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> with BUILD_ALL_PYTHON_FLAVORS= yes Poudriere builds the py39 flavours of
> the packages (although the default version is 3.11) if no flavour is
> specified for a port. So it looks like I have to @py311 all my Python
> ports if I'm having a DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python2=2.7 python3=3.11 python=3.11

Then most probably your 'make.conf' is not taken into account by poudriere.

That said, some ports explicitly require Python 3.9 or less (e.g., openjdk11 => llvm12 => python39), but according to what you're saying, this is not the problem you're facing right now.

-- 
Olivier Certner






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2210609.NtcAQq7lVP>