Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:32:01 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will@iki.fi> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, culverk@culverk.student.umd.edu Subject: Re: just found this Message-ID: <26147.938525521@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "28 Sep 1999 12:58:31 -0000." <19990928125831.17843.qmail@ns.oeno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990928125831.17843.qmail@ns.oeno.com>, Ville-Pertti Keinonen writ es: n>Actual use obviously shouldn't include cached data. Can you say off >the top of your head whether v_holdcnt applies to anything other than >v_cache_src and non-VM buffer-cache (struct buf) stuff? Sorry, no, can't answer without looking. >If not, then v_usecount == 0 could be considered non-use without >worrying about v_holdcnt, since most vnodes with cached data are going >to have an associated vm_object holding a real reference. > >> >BTW: You still haven't committed the v_id patch I sent you in May. Is >> >there any specific reason for this? >> >> I seem to remember we stalled on some detail which wouldn't or >> couldn't work was it NFS ? > >No, there was a completely unrelated NFS bug I ran into while looking >into it (which has been fixed), the last comment from you seemed to >imply that you were going to commit the patch. Sorry, we must have missed each other. I understood that since NFS held "soft references" it was pointless. Send me the patch again and lets resume that one. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26147.938525521>