Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:49:13 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:38:54 %2B0100." <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hi, > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha= > t I > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old = .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > make > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10. > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation. > > Best regards, > Bapt I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to remove old make without notice ? In FreeBSD-9.3 : bmake is not default, merely there -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 518032 Nov 5 16:58 /usr/bin/bmake* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 453176 Nov 5 16:58 /usr/bin/make* & man make has No Warning people should migrate to bmake. FreeBSD-10.0 Has Only one /usr/bin/*make (& no make.old) & No warning that it's a new make called bmake or what if any differences might be from make in 9. cd ~ ; find . -type f -name Makefile | wc -l # 739 Use of FreeBSD is not merely to rebuild FreeBSD, but to support users who want to trust FreeBSD to provide predictable functional stability. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script. Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201502122349.t1CNnD43027915>