Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:57:53 -0400 From: Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com> To: Holm Tiffe <holm@freibergnet.de>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? Message-ID: <CAKFCL4X41Ho=VZsph=FjhA9u9WGSzzOGQdc7N2URmQzWq_r7WQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150724070245.GC11640@beast.freibergnet.de> References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> <CAKFCL4VVtLspj%2BRQxSHjyQxAhixPuMiQoehoA2MYWeSgqTTwAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> <20150724004443.GC1370@lonesome.com> <20150724004939.GN84931@FreeBSD.org> <20150724070245.GC11640@beast.freibergnet.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Holm Tiffe <holm@freibergnet.de> wrote: > ...more RAM? Always more RAM? For ZFS, yes. Stick to UFS otherwise. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKFCL4X41Ho=VZsph=FjhA9u9WGSzzOGQdc7N2URmQzWq_r7WQ>