Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 14:13:39 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch Message-ID: <v04220802b50f8cad2602@[195.238.1.121]> In-Reply-To: <20000404081440.E21619@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <22448.954783492@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004031751.KAA60287@apollo.backplane.com> <20000404030757.A53939@ewok.creative.net.au> <200004032134.OAA61603@apollo.backplane.com> <20000404081440.E21619@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8:14 AM +0200 2000/4/4, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > Besides, CURRENT does allow for the tree to be broken. I guess Bleeding > Edge lost its meaning within the FreeBSD ranks. Yes, but RELENG_4 is no longer -CURRENT. Therefore, different procedures need to be applied to it, now that it is -STABLE. > Ehm. Not as if your VM stuff wasn't causing disruption. Needed, > granted, but disruptive as well. And ucd-snmp has been broken quite > some time (still is?) due to the work. > And I know of a lot of people who actively use it. We use it quite heavily here. In what way is it broken with 4.0-STABLE? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04220802b50f8cad2602>