Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 15:30:06 +0100 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> To: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why dual boot? Message-ID: <018c01c1a675$f3dcc1c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <3C4FBE5C.2AE8C65@mindspring.com> <20020123114658.A514@lpt.ens.fr> <20020123223104.SM01952@there> <3C4FBE5C.2AE8C65@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020124213809.00e6e5d0@localhost> <20020125131659.GB7374@hades.hell.gr> <3C51CD33.4E69B204@mindspring.com> <001b01c1a635$636a4170$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C5270E4.BF21F79B@mindspring.com> <011b01c1a659$fb98a670$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C52AB34.B8896C8D@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry writes: > Can you back this statement up? Only empirically. > Complexity is an emergent property of even > incredibly simple-seeming systems. But that's not what I said. I said that the more complex a system is, the less stable it will tend to be. This has nothing to do with whether or not a seemingly simple system is in fact complex. > Why you are for maintaining the status quo > of monumental effort ... I'm not. It makes no difference to me, since I do not build dual-boot systems. > I guess tyhis is OK for a developer ... It is okay for a production system or network, too. Few systems operate in isolation these days. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?018c01c1a675$f3dcc1c0$0a00000a>