Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 15:06:44 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c Message-ID: <19990706070644.CD9DB79@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Jul 1999 02:59:05 -0400." <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907060258400.92619-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> > Brian Feldman wrote:
> > > Modified files:
> > > sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c
> > > Log:
> > > I made some cleanups, rearranged things a bit, and made AMD Features de
faul
> > t
> > > printing on CPUs that have it.
> > > If there are no objections, I'll MFC all recent changes (harmless, real
ly)
> > > to 3.2 and PAO.
> >
> > RELENG_3_2_PAO is for patches from the PAO folks, we don't touch that branc
h.
>
> We don't keep it up to date? Even bugfixes? Okay :/
Because that would give extra noise on a diff between -r RELENG_3_2_PAO_BP
and -r RELENG_3_2_PAO.. The main point of having the branch was to have
the PAO changes handy for the purposes of helping the two converge. We are
not hijacking the PAO development. :-)
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990706070644.CD9DB79>