Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 18:10:49 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 14821d60aad2 - main - databases/clickhouse-cpp: Add new port Message-ID: <2420938b-ace1-41f1-a687-7678d7c5894b@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <b5825157-80d8-448e-a66b-f25b4277f23f@FreeBSD.org> References: <69541f11.36d12.e88e767@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <074ecbd1-b14f-498e-b1f8-f2d825412b85@FreeBSD.org> <b5825157-80d8-448e-a66b-f25b4277f23f@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 12/31/25 08:47, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 12/31/25 08:32, Daniel Engberg wrote: >> On 2025-12-30 19:50, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> The branch main has been updated by madpilot: >>> >>> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/? >>> id=14821d60aad2335e18bd68eec7cdfd9c3299ca9a >>> >>> commit 14821d60aad2335e18bd68eec7cdfd9c3299ca9a >>> Author: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> >>> AuthorDate: 2025-12-30 18:48:29 +0000 >>> Commit: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> >>> CommitDate: 2025-12-30 18:48:29 +0000 >>> >>> databases/clickhouse-cpp: Add new port >>> clickhouse-cpp is the official C++ client library for ClickHouse, >>> providing a fast and type-safe interface to ClickHouse using its >>> native binary protocol. >>> --- >>> databases/Makefile | 1 + >>> databases/clickhouse-cpp/Makefile | 41 +++++++++++ >>> + ++++++++ >>> databases/clickhouse-cpp/distinfo | 3 ++ >>> .../files/patch-clickhouse_base_platform.h | 20 ++++++++++ >>> .../files/patch-clickhouse_base_socket.cpp | 11 ++++++ >>> .../files/patch-clickhouse_base_socket.h | 13 +++++++ >>> databases/clickhouse-cpp/pkg-descr | 3 ++ >>> databases/clickhouse-cpp/pkg-plist | 45 +++++++++++ >>> + ++++++++++ >>> 8 files changed, 137 insertions(+) >>> >>> ... >>> >>> +.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD >>> +USES+= llvm:min=21 >>> +CFLAGS+=-Wno-error=int-conversion >>> +.endif >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is USES supposed to fix? :-) > > Actually I copied this from databases/clickhouse in early stages of > porting and, I confess, forgot about this. I did assume that the version > of clang being used was relevant, but I could be wrong. > > Now that you mention it, I need to do more testing without that > workaround. OTOH maybe databases/clickhouse too need to revise that stanza? > Removed the whole condition, as it really makes no difference. Thanks for reporting! -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2420938b-ace1-41f1-a687-7678d7c5894b>